Asylum seekers who have received a negative outcome can:
Judicial stage consists of three proceedings by law: Court of Law, Court of Appeal (they can get into the matter itself) and Court of Cassation (it can decide in the matter of legitimacy and law). A lawyer must act for the foreign citizen in each proceeding. Moreover, legal aid for underprivileged people is granted for the asylum seeker (Law 29 March 2001 n. 134; D.P.R. 30May 2002, n. 115: articles from 74 to 141). The reception facility has the duty to suggest a trusted lawyer. Obviouslu, asylum seekers can freely decide to choose another lawyer.
Appeal automatically stops expulsion, there are some exceptions, as:
It’s important that asylum seekers go in court together with as comprehensive as possible documentation. Indeed, he has to show evidence for both his own story and inclusion path in Italy.
As Territorial Commission, Court of Law can assign each kind of international protection form. In any case, Prefettura will emanate reception measures removal for the new refugee after obtaining Electronic Residence Permit.
Dublin Regulation mainly determines the States’ authority for asylum requests, it entered into force in 1999 and has been reformed three times. The fundamental point in Dublin Regulation III, now into force, is the principle establishing that the first-entry Country must take on the responsibility of the new arrivals’ application of international protection: a law that weight on border Country in particular (such as Italy and Greece).
The main principle that regulates asylum seekers’ access to reception measures is that they must prove to have “no livelihoods sufficient to ensure an appropriate quality of life for them and their family” (art. 14, par. 1 LD 142/15).
The evaluation of insufficient livelihood is realised by Prefecture-T (art. 14, par. 3 LD 142/15) “with reference to annual amount of social allowance”.